Skip to main content

DeferArgs lets you write syncronous looking functions that really aren't!

So a little side project for my own uses provided a simple decorator that lets me write a function I can pass deferreds and regular arguments to, and have the function return a deferred that fires when all of its deferred arguments are ready and the function has processed them. Some example usage:


@deferargs
def printArgs(*args, **kwargs):
print "Positional Arguments: ", ", ".join(args)
print "Keyword Arguments: ", ", ".join("%r=%s"%(k,v) for (k,v) in kwargs.items())

printArgs("foobar", baz=someNetworkRequest())


Really basic, but it can prove useful for a large portion of Twisted code you might write. I'm planning to add some semi-evil way to do something that looks a lot like a try/except/finally block but is actually (obviously) not, and works with any errbacks from deferreds within the try-like block of code. The reaction has been interesting. I've had some people stand up for the idea, which is similar to
defgen
, and others who think it is a bad idiom that is dangerous to encourage.

Using this kind of abstraction over asyncronous code, you do have to be careful to remember what is asyncronous and take consideration that your code won't run until all deferred arguments are ready, even if some parts could be run with only some of the arguments. In those cases, however, you should just break up the function, and I'd like to note that you can make the same mistakes using deferreds and the like directly, so I don't really see it as an issue.

If you want to do any error handling for the moment, you need to attach errbacks to the deferred from the function call. I want to work in my semi-evil error handling soon, because my goal here is to hide the fact that there are deferreds as much as possible, but for now this is just fine, and I've already had use of it myself.

You can get it from the Cheeseshop, so check it out there now and place any comments about it here.

Filed in:

Comments

Anonymous said…
Thanks for this! I think this goes a long way toward making Twisted code more readable (and Pythonic =)

The concerns for this is understandable, but if you know how Twisted works, then there shouldn't be a problem.
Anonymous said…
This is very cool. I don't think it is counter to the way twisted processing flow really works at all.

Popular posts from this blog

My Software Job Transition Strategies?

I’ve been spending a good deal of the last two days preparing mentally for starting a whole new challenge as a developer. New things aren’t new to me, but this is different and big enough really call for some Deep Thoughts ™. For one thing, I’ve made a big move from the world of Python web development to totally other Python work and while web development has never been the only thing I do, it has been the only work that paid the bills. That transition isn’t one that bothers me or daunts me, though. Instead, I’m thinking about transitioning to the scope of the work I’m getting into. For a long time, I juggled multiple clients and client projects every day, so no single project usually took up most of my time. Every developer juggles time through the day, but exactly how that works in each company and on each project varies a lot. I was looking for a place that I could really focus in a way that I haven’t for a long time. I think I found that, but now I have to deal with the consequen...

CARDIAC: The Cardboard Computer

I am just so excited about this. CARDIAC. The Cardboard Computer. How cool is that? This piece of history is amazing and better than that: it is extremely accessible. This fantastic design was built in 1969 by David Hagelbarger at Bell Labs to explain what computers were to those who would otherwise have no exposure to them. Miraculously, the CARDIAC (CARDboard Interactive Aid to Computation) was able to actually function as a slow and rudimentary computer.  One of the most fascinating aspects of this gem is that at the time of its publication the scope it was able to demonstrate was actually useful in explaining what a computer was. Could you imagine trying to explain computers today with anything close to the CARDIAC? It had 100 memory locations and only ten instructions. The memory held signed 3-digit numbers (-999 through 999) and instructions could be encoded such that the first digit was the instruction and the second two digits were the address of memory to operat...

The Snake Pit is About to Burst

The signs are all over the place. I can count at least five implementations of Python today: CPython, CL-Python, Jython, IronPython, and PyPy. The use of the language is sky rocketting and set to grab real mind-share as the hype over Ruby subsides. Things are looking good for a favorite green snake and british comedy troop reference, aren't they? Trouble is on the horizon in the very ingredients that could push us into true success. Our community and our very language is in danger of segregation, unless we all do something about it and learn to get along. One of the most visible dangers (to me) is being ignored for various political, cultural, and non-technical reasons. IronPython's users are increasingly pushing IronPython-only recipes, libraries, and tutorials. No one is talking about the transition of the alternative implemenations to CPython 3.0 compatability. To make matters worse, we still can not define the language without refering to an implementation. This is very un...