Skip to main content

Thank God for Standards! Or, Thank Someone Else?


Millions of dollars went into the development of the Digital Video Disc format, its licenses, encryption schemes, patents, bushiness deals to ensure its success, and all the work that went into getting rid of those troublesome plastic cases with yard after yard of magnetic tape. We can all be thankful for that!


We have gone through many forms of video, and we can take a lesson from the history of recorded audio. In 1878, Edison invented the phonograph, which we usually think of today as a cylindrical record. The lateral-disc records were technically invented in 1888, as a direct adaptation from Edison's design, but remained covered by patents and used as novelty talking toy technology for another thirty years, until the patents ran out in 1918, forty years after Edison's original invention. It would be another 56 years before the introduction of the cassette tape in Germany. The trend ended there, and we became frustrated with cassette limitations, seeing the introduction of the Compact Disc (CD) in 1982, just 18 years later. It would be only 15 more
years before the first MP3 player hit the market, although the technology of compressed digital audio had been seeing wide use in other circles for at least half a decade.

We have seen similar transition from reels, to beta, to VHS, to DVD, and now to both HD-DVD and Blu-Ray DVD. When I say to both, I really mean it! Warner Brothers is developing a triple-formatted disc, which has a DVD on one side, HD-DVD on the other, and Blu-Ray on a two-way mirror-like surface over the HD-DVD layer, allowing a single disc to work in traditional DVD players, HD-DVD, and Blu-Ray players.

Seriously, folks, what point is there to all these competing formats, when the end result is to just use all of them? Before you know it, everyone will license this WB patent and all the players we buy will support both HD-DVD and Blu-Ray, and we won't even know which format will be used because our movies and players will be playing split-personality the whole way.

The madness probably won't end until we move away from physical distribution methods, and even then there will be encoding, compression, and encryption wars, but at least our smart players and laptops will be able to just download any drivers they need automatically. Yeah, there still won't be a point to the varying formats, but it will be a little bit easier to ignore that there are competing formats, as we always will inevitably do.

Doesn't that tell anyone something?

I can't believe I can use the term "Traditional DVD", already.

Comments

Anonymous said…
"Digital Video Disc format..."

Actually...DVD stands for Digital Versatile Disk...you can get DVDs with more than just movies on them, nowadays you can even get burners built-in to computers that allow you to burn data to them...;-)
6:14 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

CARDIAC: The Cardboard Computer

I am just so excited about this. CARDIAC. The Cardboard Computer. How cool is that? This piece of history is amazing and better than that: it is extremely accessible. This fantastic design was built in 1969 by David Hagelbarger at Bell Labs to explain what computers were to those who would otherwise have no exposure to them. Miraculously, the CARDIAC (CARDboard Interactive Aid to Computation) was able to actually function as a slow and rudimentary computer.  One of the most fascinating aspects of this gem is that at the time of its publication the scope it was able to demonstrate was actually useful in explaining what a computer was. Could you imagine trying to explain computers today with anything close to the CARDIAC? It had 100 memory locations and only ten instructions. The memory held signed 3-digit numbers (-999 through 999) and instructions could be encoded such that the first digit was the instruction and the second two digits were the address of memory to operat...
1 comment
Read more

Announcing Feet, a Python Runner

I've been working on a problem that's bugged me for about as long as I've used Python and I want to announce my stab at a solution, finally! I've been working on the problem of "How do i get this little thing I made to my friend so they can try it out?" Python is great. Python is especially a great language to get started in, when you don't know a lot about software development, and probably don't even know a lot about computers in general. Yes, Python has a lot of options for tackling some of these distribution problems for games and apps. Py2EXE was an early option, PyInstaller is very popular now, and PyOxide is an interesting recent entry. These can be great options, but they didn't fit the kind of use case and experience that made sense to me. I'd never really been about to put my finger on it, until earlier this year: Python needs LÖVE . LÖVE, also known as "Love 2D", is a game engine that makes it super easy to build ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Using a React Context as a Dispatch Replacement

React Contexts are the pretty little bows of the React world. Here's a really quick example of the kind of messy code you can cleanup by using contexts, without dragging in a larger dependency like Redux or even Flux. Starting backwards with a diff showing lines of code I was able to remove: All the properties I was able to remove were just pass-through. The Carousel component didn't care about any of them, but it had to pass through these callbacks so the multiple TaskList components inside the carousel could invoke actions. They were removed from the Component class itself, too, since it no longer needed to pass them through. Where did they all go? My ActionContext removed all the need for these passthroughs by providing a single simple helper method, action(), that components rendered under it can access.   I really enjoy the pattern of passing a single callback through a context and removing what used to be lots of callback properties. Of course, I cou...
Post a Comment
Read more