Skip to main content

Ways Django Can Import Things

How many ways can django import a module?

Grep is hard for this.

In .py files

"import (.*)\..*"
"from (.*)\..* import .*"
"patterns\(['"](.*)['"]"
"url(r?['"].*, ['"](.*)"


In INSTALLED_APPS and other settings.

Am I missing any? Better question: Why do I have to wonder if I'm missing any?
Labels:

Comments

Doug Napoleone said…
You forgot about the magic __path__ hack done to the templatetags 'package' directory. It turns out that app.templatetags.app and django.templtatetags.app are two DIFFERENT imports of the same code and are independent modules with their own globals and locals...

Think about that for a while...
8:26 PM
James Bennett said…
You did actually miss one: django.utils.importlib, which is simply a copy of the available-in-future-Python importlib module that Brett Cannon helpfully backported for us to handle all the things in Django (think pluggable backend modules) which require dynamic imports. Previously we used Python's raw __import__ for that, and importlib makes it ever so much simpler, and generally they have to in order to support the sort of dynamic-but-still-concise stuff people like to do in Python.

Anyway, two of the things you've listed are just standard Python import statements, and the other two are just URL-pattern functions which -- if it bugs you that much -- will happily accept the actual callable (or an iterable of patterns, in the case of include()) instead of strings. The string option is mostly just a convenience.

So I'm not sure I really understand the "why do I have to wonder if I'm missing any"; lots of frameworks/libraries have ways to specify something as a string and get it dynamically imported later through some mechanism other than a direct "import whatever" statement.

Oh, and for Doug: the __path__ hacking for templatetags is finally gone in trunk, which means it won't be in 1.2. The last bit of "magic" from magic-removal is finally out, hallelujah.
9:19 PM
Graham Dumpleton said…
Not sure if it is what you were intent on capturing, but there is the import of the Django settings file as a special sort of case. I recently posted some stuff about that at http://blog.dscpl.com.au/2010/03/improved-wsgi-script-for-use-with.html.
10:01 PM
James Thiele said…
__import__( ... )
1:06 AM
Robert said…
Wouldn't it be nice to standardize these 'import later module strings'* that various python frameworks have as some sort of generic-ized deferredimport('some.python.path.etc') object?

*: which are sometimes necessary due to definition order and cyclic dependencies etc.
10:11 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

My Software Job Transition Strategies?

I’ve been spending a good deal of the last two days preparing mentally for starting a whole new challenge as a developer. New things aren’t new to me, but this is different and big enough really call for some Deep Thoughts ™. For one thing, I’ve made a big move from the world of Python web development to totally other Python work and while web development has never been the only thing I do, it has been the only work that paid the bills. That transition isn’t one that bothers me or daunts me, though. Instead, I’m thinking about transitioning to the scope of the work I’m getting into. For a long time, I juggled multiple clients and client projects every day, so no single project usually took up most of my time. Every developer juggles time through the day, but exactly how that works in each company and on each project varies a lot. I was looking for a place that I could really focus in a way that I haven’t for a long time. I think I found that, but now I have to deal with the consequen...
Post a Comment
Read more

CARDIAC: The Cardboard Computer

I am just so excited about this. CARDIAC. The Cardboard Computer. How cool is that? This piece of history is amazing and better than that: it is extremely accessible. This fantastic design was built in 1969 by David Hagelbarger at Bell Labs to explain what computers were to those who would otherwise have no exposure to them. Miraculously, the CARDIAC (CARDboard Interactive Aid to Computation) was able to actually function as a slow and rudimentary computer.  One of the most fascinating aspects of this gem is that at the time of its publication the scope it was able to demonstrate was actually useful in explaining what a computer was. Could you imagine trying to explain computers today with anything close to the CARDIAC? It had 100 memory locations and only ten instructions. The memory held signed 3-digit numbers (-999 through 999) and instructions could be encoded such that the first digit was the instruction and the second two digits were the address of memory to operat...
1 comment
Read more

The Snake Pit is About to Burst

The signs are all over the place. I can count at least five implementations of Python today: CPython, CL-Python, Jython, IronPython, and PyPy. The use of the language is sky rocketting and set to grab real mind-share as the hype over Ruby subsides. Things are looking good for a favorite green snake and british comedy troop reference, aren't they? Trouble is on the horizon in the very ingredients that could push us into true success. Our community and our very language is in danger of segregation, unless we all do something about it and learn to get along. One of the most visible dangers (to me) is being ignored for various political, cultural, and non-technical reasons. IronPython's users are increasingly pushing IronPython-only recipes, libraries, and tutorials. No one is talking about the transition of the alternative implemenations to CPython 3.0 compatability. To make matters worse, we still can not define the language without refering to an implementation. This is very un...
11 comments
Read more